Learning Style Test
As a supplement to our exploration of semiotics and achieving meaningful communication (understanding audience), each member of the class took a self-administered Learning Style Test.
My test results showed that I am primarily a verbal, solitary learner. The Myers-Briggs test, which I took years ago, provided a similar picture of my personality, if not learning style. So no major surprises in my testing experience.
I think I gained the most from our post-test discussions about our test experiences. Bart mentioned a 5-point Likert scale, which he and others felt would have produced a more accurate assessment than the 1-to-3-scale. I felt some of the test questions were "leading." I'm glad Bart pointed out a change in the format that could help fine tune our responses, better capture nuance.
Callie answered a question that had been on my mind as soon as I saw this test. The test's authors tout its benefits for educators and group leaders. This seemed like too much effort; could it actually be worth the effort? Do teachers actually sample entire classes? Callie had a professor who used a similar test to de-conflict and energize group-work assignments. She feels that by organizing groups according to students learning styles and personalities, more productive, balanced groups were created.


1 Comments:
Hi, Drew. Sounds like our scores were similar. I'm strangely social and solitary though...not sure what that means. Must be the Libra coming out in me. Your blog looks great.
Post a Comment
<< Home